similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to felipepena.com

Felipe Pena · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

feliperusso.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

felipemadrigal.com

FELIPE MADRIGAL | writing through another day

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

insidethepencilbox.com

Inside the Pencil Box

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

rochelleperucca.com

Rochelle Perucca

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

felicitasala.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

theperiplous.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Ideas, Ideals, Insights – Writings of a Third World professor

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

rosellaleslie.com

Have pen . . . must write - Home

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

thepennyisgone.com

The Penny Is Gone — Emil Bezverkhny

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

robinsilbergleid.com

Robin Silbergleid | writer, professor, mother

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

theperagroup.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

felicitycloake.com

Felicity Cloake

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

thepeaskeepers.com

The Peaskeepers

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

doublepluslovely.com

doublepluslovely

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

doublespaceproject.com

Double Space Project

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.