Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to felipenava.dev

Felipe Nava — Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
82match
aridan.dev
Aridan Pantoja — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
andrewbrysonbolles.com
Drew Bolles — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
andrewbolles.com
Drew Bolles — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
theryanmoreno.com
Ryan Moreno — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
ahsaanullah.dev
Ahsaan Ullah — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
artimoy.com
Arti Moysen — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
ronydev.com
Rony Silva | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
bekzot.dev
Bekzot Adylov — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
adamwoodcock.tech
Adam Woodcock — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
aronesusau.com
Arone Susau — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
maurotrigo.com
Mauro Trigo — Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
bobbyagnese.com
Bobby Agnese | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
sodiqardianto.com
Sodiq Ardianto — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
aaronjasperson.com
Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
rodin.dev
Ilia Rodin — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
donado.io
Isaac Donado — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
adilraqioui.tech
Adil Raqioui — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
pintodasgaiolas.com
Guilherme Pinto — Software Engineer @ Deel
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.