Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to feelear.com

(주)필리어디자인그룹 · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
62match
mido-studio.com
(ceramic studio)mido
2 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
56match
heydesignlab.com
HEY, design LAB
1 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
54match
jicsofficial.com
JICS
2 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
51match
cowjin.com
COWJIN 카우진
1 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
47match
cdflexshop.com
비비디 | with vividi, be vivid!
2 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
44match
baesooyoung.com
ARTIST BAE SOOYOUNG
2 co-citations4 shared tech0 shared categoryfine-art
40match
dezign21.com
디자인21
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
38match
grid-dot.com
그리드
2 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
37match
bookillust.com
BIRTH OF ILLUSTBOOK
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
37match
hangulssi.com
한글씨 | 글자를 그리는
2 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
36match
geuljakong.com
글자콩이
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
35match
hdcont.com
현대컨테이너 한림
2 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
35match
hnarchi.com
경간도시디자인건축사사무소
0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
35match
ggcubicle.com
㈜공간큐비클
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
34match
2nul.com
이널
2 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
34match
ggoomdesign.com
꿈디자인
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
33match
maisonkorea.com
메종코리아
2 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
33match
cbartc.com
충북아트센터 기획디자인 국제공모
0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.