Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to fedecarg.com

Federico Cargnelutti – Builder of user-focused products · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
arshtec.com
ARSHtec - Product-focused!
1 shared topicsstartups
68match
arshia.io
Arshia Moghaddam — Product Builder
1 shared topicsstartups
68match
benita.me
Nir Benita — Product Builder
1 shared topicsstartups
68match
inventorblueprint.com
Inventor Blueprint — Patent Product Builder
1 shared topicsstartups
67match
roimulia.com
Roi Mulia | Product Builder & Startup Mentor
1 shared topicsstartups
67match
nexwindo.com
Nexwindo - We Build & Scale Digital Products
1 shared topicsstartups
67match
themotionbridge.com
The Motion Bridge | Builder Portfolio
1 shared topicsstartups
66match
mattpell.com
Matt Pell - Product Builder & Entrepreneur
1 shared topicsstartups
66match
rizqaiser.com
Riz Qaiser — Builder of Cool Stuff
1 shared topicsstartups
66match
adlk.io
Stefan Malzner — Product designer & founder of Franz
1 shared topicsstartups
66match
kudinov.io
Dmitry Kudinov — Entrepreneur & Product Builder
1 shared topicsstartups
66match
grekaner.com
Grekaner — I build products faster than I can market them
1 shared topicsstartups
66match
pinebase.io
Pinebase - Product Studio for Founders
1 shared topicsstartups
65match
8li.io
8LI — Senior Product & Technical Partnership
1 shared topicsstartups
65match
8thlanei.com
8LI — Senior Product & Technical Partnership
1 shared topicsstartups
65match
andslashorpodcast.com
AND / OR — The hard choices behind great products
1 shared topicsstartups
65match
abur.io
Arthur Burnichon - Product Maker
1 shared topicsstartups
65match
invntiv.com
Invntiv – From Napkin to Product
1 shared topicsstartups

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.