Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to featuredicon.com

J.Tierra | platform development · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
greydd.com
Grey Design & Development
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
rockitengine.com
RockitEngine - Design & Development
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
alextruesdale.net
Alex Truesdale | Development & Design
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
3dfoil.com
Homepage - Daventry Decor Development
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
groenboothman.com
Groen & Boothman | Industrial Design & Development
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
platform64.co.uk 🇬🇧
Platform 64 Design Studio
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
anhdangdesign.com
ANH DANG DESIGN – Product Design & Development
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
1creativecove.com
Creative Cove - Design, Development, and Concepts
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
sofiantallal.com
Tallal Product Development
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
faulconerdesign.com
Faulconer Design Development
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
sofieschrauwen.com
Portfolio Sofie Schrauwen | Design & Product Development
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
newallstudio.com
New Product Development | newall studio | Industrial Design Vancouver
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
bigfun.net
Big Fun Development Corporation
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
1es.dev
One‑Eyed Squirrel Development
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
picohat.com
PicoHat Pi Pico Development Board
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
pico-hat.com
PicoHat Pi Pico Development Board
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
pixlapps.com
Pixl Apps - Marcel Schmidt Portfolio of UX and Product Design & Development Work
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
2bstudio.com
Design Driven Product Development | Grand Rapids, Michigan | 2B Studio
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.