Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to fdaniall.com

Fakhri Danial | Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
84match
guerrajavierswe.com
Portfolio | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
83match
alfredojahn.dev
Alfredo Jahn | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
adrianlara.org
Adrian Lara | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
dmasilva.com
David Owuor | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
benrogers.dev
Ben Rogers | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
kushbhalodi.com
Kush Bhalodi | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
cluzier.dev
Conner Luzier | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
aridan.dev
Aridan Pantoja — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
mashoado.com
Masho Ado | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
andrewdeck.dev
Andrew Deck | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
somkene.com
Somkene Ojukwu | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
arthursena.com
sena | software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
dnhen.com
dnhen | software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
bnuckols.com
Brennon Nuckols | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
dmajeed.com
Daniyal Majeed | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
aronesusau.com
Arone Susau — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
bobbyagnese.com
Bobby Agnese | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
faridvatani.com
Farid Vatani | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.