Piperic Business Intelligence

similar sites

Sites similar to fbookunder.com

f.book_under · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation

mirrorliang.com

3 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

원목가구전문 키즈우드

2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

1 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

호호문방구

3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

jiyoocompany.com

지유컴퍼니

2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

(주)백프로 가방, 완벽한BAG 완벽한PRO

2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

프리미엄 안경 액세서리 쇼핑몰 보니엘에 오신 것을 환영합니다!

3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

1 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

그로브스토어

3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

1 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

(주)협진코퍼레이션

2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

banilafruits.com

BANILA FRUITS 바닐라프루츠

1 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorygrocery-shopping

한반도철망에 오신걸 환영합니다. 온라인 최저가 쇼핑몰.

3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

3 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

2 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

co-citations how often the same third-party websites link out to both — sites referenced together tend to serve the same world.
shared tech how much of their technology stack (CMS, e‑commerce, analytics, frameworks…) overlaps.
shared category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
positioning how closely their titles and on‑page wording line up.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.