Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to fazxes.com

Pranit Sharma · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
themihirsharma.com
TheMihirSharma
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
maxpetretta.com
Max Petretta
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
thesharpdev.com
The Sharp Dev
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
newshari.com
New Shari
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
pipboi.dev
Hello, I am Parth Sharma!
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
thesiddd.com
Home – Siddharth Sharma
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
andrewgurung.com
Andrew Gurung – Senior Software Engineer @NIH. Previously Programmer Analyst @FedEx
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
armandoneto.com
Armando Biagioni Neto
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
krupalvirani.com
Krupal Virani
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
aayushsharma.me
Aayush Sharma | OSS Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
abhishah.info
Abhi Shah | Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
alex-schimpf.com
Alexander Schimpf - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
alexander-schimpf.com
Alexander Schimpf - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
alexschimpf.dev
Alexander Schimpf - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
adityamohta.dev
Kumar Aditya Mohta
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
adrianmiles.io
Adrian Miles - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
divisionfieldguide.com
Christopher Mancini | Problem Solver Who Writes Code
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
kylezapcic.com
Kyle Zapcic
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.