Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to fazevedo.dev

Filipe Azevedo · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
theostanton.com
Theo Stanton
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
dominicjuhn.com
Dominic Johnson
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
alex-schimpf.com
Alexander Schimpf - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
alexander-schimpf.com
Alexander Schimpf - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
alexschimpf.dev
Alexander Schimpf - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
divisionfieldguide.com
Christopher Mancini | Problem Solver Who Writes Code
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
kylecaprio.dev
Kyle Caprio | Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
kylezapcic.com
Kyle Zapcic
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
kyrilibragimov.com
Kyril Ibragimov
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
maxpetretta.com
Max Petretta
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
mayurathavale.com
Mayur Athavale
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
chrishaleservices.co.uk 🇬🇧
Chris Hale Services
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
gregamato.dev
ShartsRanch
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
andrewlwatts.com
Andrew L Watts
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
ankitbansal.dev
Ankit Bansal • Peerlist Profile
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
argonautengineering.com
Argonaut Engineering - Home
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
alawrence.tech
alawrence blog
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
meaningfulengineer.com
Alan Martinovic – The Meaningful Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.