Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to fatimabader.com

Fatima Bader – Fantasy With A Twist · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
nicolewheeler.com
Nicole Wheeler – Fantasy Author
1 shared topicsfantasy
70match
fayefrossiart.com
Faye Frossiart – Fantasy
1 shared topicsfantasy
69match
alexsteele.net
Alex Steele Author – Fantasy lives here
1 shared topicsfantasy
69match
booksahoy.com
Books Ahoy – Fantasy Fiction Books
1 shared topicsfantasy
69match
guyantibes.com
Guy Antibes – – Fantasy Author
1 shared topicsfantasy
69match
andrewjluther.com
Andrew J. Luther – Fantasy novelist and roleplayer
1 shared topicsfantasy
68match
arwenmccain.com
Arwen McCain – Epic Fantasy Author
1 shared topicsfantasy
67match
robert-nakamura.com
Robert Nakamura – Grimdark Fantasy Author
1 shared topicsfantasy
67match
dominofinn.com
Domino Finn – Tough Guy Urban Fantasy
1 shared topicsfantasy
66match
benhallaways.com
Ben Hallaways – Author of Historical Fantasy Fiction
1 shared topicsfantasy
66match
irenetopaloglou.com
Irene Topaloglou – Epic Fantasy Author & Illustrator
1 shared topicsfantasy
66match
rklausertales.com
Rudi Klauser M + M Tales – Gay fantasy fiction stories
1 shared topicsfantasy
66match
fantasyweave.com
Fantasy Weave
1 shared topicsfantasy
66match
dkblade.com
blades fantasy writer uk
1 shared topicsfantasy
66match
kropuch.com
Matúš's Fantasy World
1 shared topicsfantasy
66match
bogeystories.com
Urban Griot - Fantasy Fiction with Black Voices
1 shared topicsfantasy
65match
art-junko-otsu.com
The Fantasy World of Junko Otsu
1 shared topicsfantasy
65match
arlach.com
A.R Lach | fantasy author
1 shared topicsfantasy

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.