Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to farukcan.com

Faruk Can · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
85match
farukcan.dev
Faruk Can
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
farukspahic.com
Faruk Spahic
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
faruksnote.com
FaruksNote
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
thestackcanary.com
The Stack Canary
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
bobandjaime.com
bobandjaime
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
pierrickcatalo.com
Pierrick Catalo
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
divijsanjanwala.com
Divij Sanjanwala
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
neviljobanputra.com
Nevil Jobanputra
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
activ.md
Ciobanu — Do Something
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
aeroport.md
Ciobanu — Do Something
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
cloudbook.com
Ciobanu — Do Something
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
interiorsquotemaker.com
Livana · Interior Quotations
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
pixnewsly.com
Pixnewsly - Informative Blog
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
benjibanwart.dev
Benjamin Banwart | Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
benjamincanac.dev
benjamincanac (Benjamin Canac) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
feedcanon.dev
Feedcanon — Find Canonical Feed URLs
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
cloudslicer3d.com
Cloud Slicer - Instant Quotes for 3D Printing
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
actallcanada.net
Actall Canada | Real Time Location System technology
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.