Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to farrimond.com

jfarrimo.github.io · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
aaroncaswell.com
porkchop.github.io
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
theproblow.com
problow.github.io | ProBlow
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
codeweft.com
My Projects | codeweft.github.io
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
roboschreiber.com
roboschreiber.github.io | Robo Schreiber
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
l-oj.com
larry-oj · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
dita-users.com
DITA Users · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
thepotato.dev
ThePotatoGuy · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
mattchard.com
mchar7 (Matt) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
invition.dev
iNViTiON (MiX) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
benedikt-lohse.dev
LinuxTux23 (bl) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
mb-media.net
vonWeihermuehle · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
robertsenseman.com
rsenseman (Rob) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
coderealm.io
JackOfMostTrades (Ian Haken) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
coderealms.io
JackOfMostTrades (Ian Haken) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
robotsquidward.com
robotsquidward (A.J. Kueterman) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
therealdev.com
Josh-XT (Josh XT) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
andrewlmartin.dev
AndrewR3K (Andrew) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
arjen.dev
arjenbos (Arjen Bos) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.