Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to farragobooks.com

Home – Farrago Books · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
driveamemoir.com
Drive – A Memoir
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
armidabooks.com
Armida Books – Armida Books
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
armidapublications.com
Armida Books – Armida Books
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
krupage.com
Krupa Ge – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
thenovl.com
NOVL – Home | The NOVL
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
blufitechnologies.com
Bookwitch – Fall in love with books!
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
roxannelee.com
Roxanne Lee Books – Author
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
kurtiswiebe.com
Home – The Stories of Kurtis Wiebe
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
robert-pence-author.com
Robert Pence – Author
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
rosegreeve.com
Rose Greeve – author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
gregsbegoodstories.com
My First Stories – First Stories
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
mcatelee.com
M. C. Lee Books – Hope, Humor, and Happy Endings
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
mcleebooks.com
M. C. Lee Books – Hope, Humor, and Happy Endings
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
robinjamesbooks.com
Home • Robin James
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
bevswansonbooks.com
Bev Swanson Books – …..
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
booksfrommyangel.com
Books – Pamela L. Blake
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
bloombalena.com
BloombaLena – Book Club
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
rylanhart.com
Rylan Hart – Writer
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.