Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to faroukbenamor.com

Farouk Ben Amor — Fullstack Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
82match
nahinbuezo.dev
Nahin Buezo — Fullstack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
amjayem.com
Asif Mahmud Jayem — Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
kiranism.dev
Kiran S </> Fullstack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
anasbenalla.com
Anas Benalla — Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
therafiniac.com
Rafi — Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
skasoft.dev
aDam | Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
abids.tech
Abid Shaikh — Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
9nth.dev
Kristián Kopera | Fullstack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
thiluxan.com
Thiluxan — Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
aryan-shrestha.com
Aryan | Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
arsalanreshi.dev
Arsalan Reshi — Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
4dmu.dev
4Dmu — Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
malikbenabid.com
Malik Benabid | Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
naeemudheenp.com
Naeemudheen P - Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
aaronaperez.dev
Aaron Perez — Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
1ceit.com
iceit - Fullstack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
maisam.dev
Maisam Afshar | Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
amoghb.com
Amogh Bagkar | Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.