Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to farooqib.com

Badrul Farooqi · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
farofeatures.com
Home | Faro
1 shared topicsstartups
65match
diverseawareness.com
Work - Diverseawareness
1 shared topicsstartups
65match
kunalpandya.com
A Personal Journal of Kunal Pandya - from the CEO of NCrypted | Startup Guru | Early Stage Investor
1 shared topicsstartups
64match
rogeryahchouchi.com
Roger Yahchouchi | Turning Knowledge Into Profitable and Scalable Products
1 shared topicsstartups
64match
360recruitment.com
v-esq
1 shared topicsstartups
64match
arshtec.com
ARSHtec - Product-focused!
1 shared topicsstartups
63match
andrewscherkus.com
Andrew Scherkus
1 shared topicsstartups
63match
farjadp.com
Startup Advisor & Product Strategist | Farjad .P
1 shared topicsstartups
63match
kurtisbodrogi.com
Kurtis Bodrogi — Product Manager
1 shared topicsstartups
63match
instantscalemate.com
ScaleMate
1 shared topicsstartups
63match
doihavepmf.com
Do I Have Product-Market Fit?
1 shared topicsstartups
63match
maxogles.com
Max Ogles
1 shared topicsstartups
63match
farabihassan.com
Farabi Hassan
1 shared topicsstartups
62match
abiolaajibola.dev
Abiola Ajibola | Product Engineer for Non-Technical Founders and Startups
1 shared topicsstartups
62match
agiletalks.org
Agile Talks - Startups, Product and Software development
1 shared topicsstartups
62match
blue-beach.com
BB BlueBeachSchool
1 shared topicsstartups
62match
divvsaxena.com
Divv Saxena - Builder, Investor, Creator
1 shared topicsstartups
62match
sofuckingagile.com
SoFuckingAgile
1 shared topicsstartups

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.