Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to farishm.com

Muhammad Faris - Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
82match
fcoterroba.com
fcoterroba - software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
ahmad-mahmood.dev
Ahmad Mahmood - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
newtolearn.com
Mohammad Faiz | Software Engineer at TutorialsPoint
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
gtsif.com
George Tsiftsis - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
adamgrady.dev
Adam Grady | Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
adarshyadav.dev
Adarsh Yadav - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
mcnairkris.com
Kris McNair - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
sohamsattigeri.com
Soham Sattigeri - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
angelgrimaldo.dev
Angel Grimaldo - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
guerrajavierswe.com
Portfolio | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
theobourgeois.com
Théo Bourgeois - Software Engineer in Halifax
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
rjcodes.dev
Lee Ren Jie | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
bekkhus.dev
Max Bekkhus - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
ahmedhani.tech
Ahmed Hani Yousef | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
faridraka.dev
Farid Raka | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
ronydev.com
Rony Silva | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
farisantoni.com
Faris Danish | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
andriyn.tech
Andri Yani - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.