Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to fargh.com

Farhad Gholami Estahbanati · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
64match
feigdev.com
E John Feig
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
felixtessier.com
Felix Tessier
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
rossark0.com
Ross
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
arhaankeshwani.com
Arhaan Keshwani
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
codeciech.com
Software Engineer & Solution Architect
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
soloapps.dev
SoloApps
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
codedicated.com
Codedicated
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
guilhermeboia.com
Guilherme Boia | Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
hidefsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
HiDef Software Ltd
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
arnewerner.com
Arne Werner – Developer & Creative Technologist
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
softwareaz.com
Software A to Z
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
iomancer.dev
iomancer | living systems, projects, and ideas
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
mattrunyon.com
Matt Runyon | Software Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
62match
abrstudio.net
AbrStudio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
codevalue.com
CodeValue | The best software solutions company
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
codevalue-group.com
CodeValue | The best software solutions company
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
codewell.com
Codewell Corporation
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
maxkapur.com
Illusion Slopes | Illusion Slopes
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.