Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to farahzaatar.com

Farah Zaatar · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
farahwebtech.com
Farah
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
67match
mattiyat.dev
Home | mattiyat.dev
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
adarshapc.dev
Adarsha | Frontend Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
abhinavkumar.dev
Abhinav Kumar
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
farhadeidi.com
Farhad Eidi
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
kryzak.com
Jeph Kryzak | kryzak.com
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
66match
ahmadamin.net
M Ahmad Amin
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
alexandrachristopoulou.com
Alexandra Christopoulou - Frontend Developer & Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
66match
abbosbek.uz
Abbosbek Sulaymonov | Frontend Developer & React Expert
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
kumabayne.com
Portfolio - Cullen Bayne
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
andrewmansur.com
Andrew Mansur - Web Developer & Designer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
anjezagashi.dev
Anjeza Gashi - Web Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
alexoviedo.info
Alejandro Oviedo - Front-End Developer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
66match
farihane.com
Farihane Zannou — Creative Developer & Digital Designer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
66match
kwasiampadu.com
Kwasi Ampadu | Frontend Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
66match
mcartmell.com
Software developer & designer | Matt Cartmell
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
aboutmichael.dev
Michael Abraham | Full Stack Developer & Designer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
guids.dev
Guids.dev - Web Developer & Designer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.