Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to farah-libardee.com

Farah Libardee - Poet and writer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
alanmoore.net
Alan Moore - Poet & Writer
2 shared topicspoetry
70match
irenesherlock.com
Irene Sherlock – Poet and Writer
2 shared topicspoetry
70match
benstarrwrites.com
Ben Starr - Poet & Writer
2 shared topicspoetry
69match
roberthunterjones.com
Robert Hunter Jones - Poet & writer
2 shared topicspoetry
69match
rosannaoh.com
Rosanna Young Oh – Poet and Essayist
2 shared topicspoetry
68match
farahghafoor.com
Farah Ghafoor
2 shared topicspoetry
68match
maureenjeffs.com
Maureen Jeffs, Poet and Writer – 1942 – 2015
2 shared topicspoetry
68match
mattpelicano.com
Matt Pelicano :: Writer, Poet & Public Speaker
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
arnoldadoff.com
Arnold Adoff - Poet and Anthologist
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
robinaburrows.com
Robin A. Burrows – Writer. Poet. Dreamer.
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
maureenalsop.com
Maureen Alsop | Writer and Poet
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
ashleyclaytonkay.com
Ashley Clayton Kay – Author | Poet | Freelance Writer | Editor
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
arminhas.com
A.R. Minhas - Writer, Poet, Artist & Reviewer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
clydeaidoo.com
Original Clyde Aidoo | Independent Thinker, Writer, Poet
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
robwriter.com
Rob Wright | Poet & Writer
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
annachorlton.com
Anna Chorlton - Cornish writer
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
rogeraplon.com
Roger Aplon – Writer and Poet
2 shared topicspoetry
66match
angelengravings.com
ángel carreras – Opinion, Writing, Poetry, and Media
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.