similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to fancycode.com

fancycode (Joachim Bauch) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

actual.software

nirholas (nich) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

nekocode (nekocode) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

a8f (Alex) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

TheZacillac (Zac Roach) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Ajoo (João Bravo) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

binarycodes.dev

binarycodes (Sujoy Das) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

aaix (aidan) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Inueni · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

trey-k · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

a-jd (AJ Dave) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

niapoor (Nia Poor) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Krysov (krysov) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

1LtFord · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

aPinat (aPinat) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

thexman · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

faqeel (Fares) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

kylemichaelfox.com

kfox112 (Kyle) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Mes-ser (Messer) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.