similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to fakhris.com

Fakhris alternatives & similar sites

Fakhris || Build Strong. Build for the future. — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Construction Industry →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
dehavillandconstruction.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	De’ Havilland Construction \| Building the Future	en	construction-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4workcorp.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	4workcorp – Building the Future	en	construction-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
axisriseae.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Axisrise: Building the Future of Space Construction \| AXISRISE BUILDING CONTRACTING	en	construction-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
samaammon.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	CONTRACTING - SAMA AMMON - BUILDING THE FUTURE	en	construction-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
samuelreneeholdings.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Samuel Renee Holdings \| Building The Future	en	construction-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
luxerboard.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Luxer Board \| For The Building of Tomorrow	en	construction-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
8-chemie.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	8-CHEMIE Adhesives & Sealants \| Helping Build Stronger Bonds	en	construction-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
utilibuild.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Utilibuild \| Utilizing Everything to Build Anything	en	construction-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
accessbuilt.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Access Built: The Future of Adaptive and Inclusive Design	en	construction-industry Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
carraraworks.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Carrara Works — Automation for the companies building America	en	construction-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
basemanagement.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Base – Built for Builders	en	construction-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
actbuildingsystems.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Cold Formed Building Systems - ACT Building Systems	en	construction-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
samatabuilders.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Samata Builders – Building Your Future	en	construction-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
cascadeicf.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Cascade ICF – Build Strong With Concrete	en	construction-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jonescoi.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Insurance Compliance at Scale for the Built World \| Jones	en	construction-industry WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bs-solutions.co.uk ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	BS Solutions Group Construction — Build Bold. Build Right.	GB en	construction-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
upscaleurbanbuilders.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Uscale Urban Builder – Shaping The future of living	en	construction-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
allfs.com.au ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	All Facility Services - Building Stronger Communities	AU en	construction-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.