similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to faarmproject.org

Faarmproject alternatives & similar sites

The FAARM Project | Framework for Accountability in Academic Research and Mentoring — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Education →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
donewellresearch.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Donewell Research - Excellence in Academic Research	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
4anthropology.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	4Anthropology -- Search for Anthropology Education, Tutoring, and Research	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lluisaschlesier.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Dr Lluïsa Schlesier Corrales – This website provides an overview of my research and academic activities	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
doorbellresearch.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Doorbell — Research Collaboration for Pharmacy Academics	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
prowritter.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	ProWrite Research: Professional Academic Writing & Research Services	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ericksoneducation.net ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	John F. Erickson - Teaching and Research/Projects	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aarf.asia ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Association of Academic Researchers and Faculties	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
ctcap.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	About the Cape Town Convention Academic Project - Cape Town Convention Academic Project	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nationalmentoringresourcecenter.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	National Mentoring Resource Center	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
afaf.org.uk ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Academics For Academic Freedom - Free speech, no ifs no buts	United Kingdom en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
intelliher.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	STEM Opportunities and Mentorship for Students \| IntelliHer Initiative	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
elevateos.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	ElevateOS — The visibility layer for tutoring and admissions	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
atlas-research.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Atlas Research Institute	en	education	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
elevateindy.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Elevate Indianapolis \| Holistic Mentoring Redefining Economic Mobility	en	education Webflow	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
erin-johnston.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Erin Johnston \| Sociologist, Researcher, and Teacher.	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cssar.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Center for Social Security Action & Research	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
interventionexpress.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Intervention Express - A Comprehensive Inventory of Academic and Behavior Interventions	en	education Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
myprojectheart.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Project Heart \| Philanthropy Education for Students \| Project Heart	United States~ en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.