Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to exmiscellanea.com

ExMiscellanea · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
64match
gamersplane.com
Gamers Plane
1 shared topicsroleplaying-games
64match
games-tour.com
Games Tour
1 shared topicsroleplaying-games
64match
shoalmontgames.com
Shoalmont Games – Running OSR Games
1 shared topicsroleplaying-games
63match
planet-epsilon.com
Planet Epsilon
1 shared topicsroleplaying-games
63match
caffeinatedalien.com
Caffeinated Alien
1 shared topicsroleplaying-games
62match
planescape-campaign.com
Planescape Campaign
1 shared topicsroleplaying-games
62match
planetmercenary.com
Planet Mercenary
1 shared topicsroleplaying-games
62match
3d-flukez.com
Flukez
1 shared topicsroleplaying-games
62match
gamerpeak.com
Gamer Peak – A blog about Gaming, Teaching, D&D, and Fatherhood.
1 shared topicsroleplaying-games
62match
2toast.com
2Toast | RPG Character Art
1 shared topicsroleplaying-games
62match
andyhobday.com
Andy Hobday - Game Designer
1 shared topicsroleplaying-games
62match
swaadtiffin.com
DND-Manager
1 shared topicsroleplaying-games
62match
macmillangames.com
MacMillan RPG Games
1 shared topicsroleplaying-games
62match
planetpoltera.com
Planet Poltera - Home
1 shared topicsroleplaying-games
62match
diplomaticon.com
THE DIPLOMATICON – A site for the game of Diplomacy played online
1 shared topicsroleplaying-games
62match
escape-committee.com
The Escape Committee Site Network
1 shared topicsroleplaying-games
62match
supra-genius.com
Supra-Genius - Home
1 shared topicsroleplaying-games
62match
batjutsu.com
Batjutsu – Writing, Role-Playing (TTRPG, PBM, LARP), Gaming, Martial Arts. Disabled but not giving up.
1 shared topicsroleplaying-games

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.