Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to evansit.dev

Stevan Stanisic — Software Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
79match
ktariayman.com
Ayman Ktari — Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
ktleary.com
Kevin Leary — Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
ricabaguhin.com
Rica — Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
rishikeshkumar.com
Rishikesh Kumar — Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
djwcomeau.com
David Comeau — Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
richardhan.com
Richard Han — Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
ogadar.com
Rodgers Ogada — Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
camerondyas.com
Cameron Dyas — Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
krislito.com
Kris Lito | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
andyhsmith.com
Andy H Smith — Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
kucenko.dev
Alexey Kucenko — Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
ivankapunac.com
Ivan Kapunac | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
kodeman.dev
Kodeman | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
konarobinson.com
Connor Robinson — Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
angellaqian.com
AQ | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
reynersubrata.com
Reyner Subrata | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
dndoops.com
DnDoops — Software Development
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
henamorado.com
Henrry Enamorado — Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.