Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to evanoff.dev

Hunter Evanoff | Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
82match
dobridobrev.com
Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
anthonyapps.com
Anthony Apicella | Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
helarduranmurillo.com
Helar Duran - Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
dlindegren.com
Daniel Lindegren - Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
djtaylorcodes.com
DJ Taylor | Full Stack Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
shivaprogramming.com
Shiva | Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
izabellastern.com
Izabella Stern | Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
gauravkashyap.com
Gaurav Kashyap - Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
calumdiprose.com
Calum - Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
maajid.dev
Ahmed Maajid - Full Stack Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
gavhart.com
Gavin Hart | Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
abanoub-ayoub.com
Abanoub Ayoub | Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
kouzana.com
Fedi <KOUZANA/> | Full Stack web developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
pjsalita.com
PJ Salita - Passionate Full-Stack Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
andresgazui.com
Andres Gazui | Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
dishantkapoor.com
Dishant Kapoor - Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
gatinafoy.com
Gatina Foy | Full Stack Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
pogranyitamas.com
Tamás Pogrányi | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.