Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to evanm.dev

Evan McIntire · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
andrewhxue.com
Andrew Xue
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
andreasellwanger.com
Andreas Ellwanger
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
cameronlai.com
Cameron Lai - Cameron Lai
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
divisionfieldguide.com
Christopher Mancini | Problem Solver Who Writes Code
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
esosaohangbon.com
Esosa Ohangbon
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
gbramwell.com
gregbramwell.com
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
henriwoodcock.com
Henri Woodcock
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
heysaurabh.com
Saurabh Kumar - Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
itskoba.dev
Home | Koba
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
anthonyarellano.com
Anthony Arellano
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
itsmeswe.com
It's me SWE
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
richieri.io
Fabricio Richieri
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
shenghangao.com
Stefan Gao | Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
bderiel.com
Brian's Personal Site
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
callbackheaven.com
() => Callback Heaven
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
diogothecoder.com
Diogo Costa Official: Instagram, X, Facebook | Linktree
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
heidmann.com
Paul Heidmann
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
ethanquarry.com
Ethan Quarry
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.