Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to evanking.dev

Evan King | Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
83match
heinsoe.com
Hein Soe | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
ankanpal.com
Ankan Pal | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
lwebb.dev
Logan Webb | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
sharmayash.com
Yash Sharma | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
antipotion.com
Antipotion | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
connortabora.com
Connor Tabora | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
reuss.dev
Tobias Reuß | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
dnuge.dev
Daniel Nugent | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
itshamzajaved.com
Hamza Javed | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
itsnoor.dev
Noor Ul Hassan Tariq | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
andydiaz.dev
Andy Díaz Valdiviezo | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
dnhen.com
dnhen | software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
gedasga.com
GedasGa | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
mohanedmetawea.com
Mohaned Metawea | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
0xomer.com
Omer | Software Engineer & Instructor
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
kofimupati.com
Kofi Mupati | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
anuchadev.com
Anucha Ngoenkhao | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
isosman.com
Islam Osman | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.