Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to evankaplan.com

Evan Kaplan · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
evanliu.com
Evan Liu
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
evanbacon.dev
Evan Bacon
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
evanbaule.com
Evan Baule
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
evangordeaux.com
Evan Gordon
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
evanperlman.com
Evan Perlman
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
evan-peacock.com
Evan Peacock
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
evanwitt.dev
Evan Witt </>
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
replane.dev
Replane
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
evansoubliere.com
Home - Evan Soubliere
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
evanrosebrook.com
About | Evan Rosebrook
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
evanlaw.dev
Evan Law · Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
evanjelle.com
Evan Jelle - Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
sintho.com
Azlond (Jan Kaiser) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
evanolder.com
Evan Older - Computer Scientist
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
evanpblack.com
Evan Black - Software Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
evanraffel.com
evman182 (Evan Raffel) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
bevanneib.com
Bevan Neiberg - Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
62match
evanmora.com
Evan Mora — CTO & Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.