Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to evanfrisch.com

Evan Frisch — Software Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
imanipaul.com
Imani Paul — Software Engineer
2 shared topicscareers
69match
denniswachira.com
Dennis Wachira — Software Engineer
2 shared topicscareers
67match
a-kurt.com
Ajtene KURTALIQI - Fullstack developer - Software Engineer - Craftswoman.
2 shared topicscareers
67match
maldivian.dev
Musaid - Senior Developer
2 shared topicscareers
66match
babafemicodes.dev
Babafemi Adojutelegan — Senior Software Engineer
2 shared topicscareers
66match
alban-elezi.dev
Alban Elezi | Software Engineer
2 shared topicscareers
66match
adamlyon.net
Adam Lyon | Senior Web Developer
2 shared topicscareers
66match
andersoftware.com
Andersson Quintero — Senior Software Engineer & Tech Lead
2 shared topicscareers
66match
andykras.org
Andrey Krasnov - Developer - Resume
2 shared topicscareers
66match
andermin.com
Jonah Andermin - Software Engineer
2 shared topicscareers
66match
khairulghalil.com
Khairul Ghalil | Software Engineer
2 shared topicscareers
66match
kietpham.dev
Kiet Pham | Senior Software Engineer
2 shared topicscareers
65match
denisveleaev.com
CV Front-End Developer | Denis Veleaev
2 shared topicscareers
65match
eugenrupi.com
Eugen Rupi - Full Stack Software Engineer
2 shared topicscareers
65match
eugenrupi.dev
Eugen Rupi - Full Stack Software Engineer
2 shared topicscareers
65match
manavmanuprakash.com
Manav | Senior iOS Developer & Tech Lead
2 shared topicscareers
65match
namdangtech.com
Dang Tran Nam - Senior Software Engineer
2 shared topicscareers
65match
aniefon.dev
Aniefon Umanah | Senior Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicscareers

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.