Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to evanfenner.com

Home · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
85match
monatrox.com
Home
2 shared topicscareers
66match
shichengrao.com
Home | Shicheng Rao
2 shared topicscareers
65match
obloshenkin.com
Oleh Bloshenkin – Engineering Manager | Developer Experience (DevEx)
2 shared topicscareers
64match
modern-dev.com
Modern-Dev | Bohdan Shtepan
2 shared topicscareers
63match
istrathdee.com
Ian Strathdee | Engineering Resume
2 shared topicscareers
63match
itinatour.com
Robert Whittaker | Senior Software Engineer
2 shared topicscareers
63match
surbhivinayak.com
Surbhi Vinayak
2 shared topicscareers
63match
cailhe.com
Thomas CAILHE - DevOps Engineer
2 shared topicscareers
62match
eshwarkoka.com
Eshwar Koka — Engineering Lead (Backend)
2 shared topicscareers
62match
moeedcodes.com
Remote Software Engineer - Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicscareers
62match
andrewdigeronimo.com
Andrew DiGeronimo - Home
2 shared topicscareers
62match
shanmukhayyagari.com
Shanmukh Ayyagari
2 shared topicscareers
62match
mohamedabdelrahman.com
Mohamed Abdelrahman | Sr. System Architect & Technical Team Leader
2 shared topicscareers
62match
isuroo.com
Isuru Rodrigo — Lead QA Engineer & Scrum Master
2 shared topicscareers
62match
andresed.dev
Andrés Esquivel | Senior Backend Engineer — NestJS, AWS & Microservices
2 shared topicscareers
62match
anthonysresume.com
Anthony Sherwin - Software Engineer, Software Lead and Technical Lead
2 shared topicscareers
62match
bedwinning.com
Bedwinning — your backdoor to gatekept technology
2 shared topicscareers
62match
kylepotts.com
Kyle Potts
2 shared topicscareers

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.