Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to evandancer.com

Evan Dancer - YC Founder, Dad, and Engineering Leader · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
naitikmehta.com
Naitik Mehta - Founder, designer, engineer
1 shared topicsstartups
67match
andjelakanjo.com
Andjela Kanjo - Builder, Founder, Engineer
1 shared topicsstartups
67match
adrianteh.me
Adrian Teh | Founding Engineer, Technical Product Leader & Exited Founder
1 shared topicsstartups
67match
patnir.com
Founding Engineer
1 shared topicsstartups
67match
amithms.com
Amith MS | Founding Engineer
1 shared topicsstartups
66match
paulingalls.com
Paul Ingalls — Startup Founder, Engineer & Entrepreneur
1 shared topicsstartups
66match
pawelsas.com
Pawel Sas - Founder, Freelancer and wannabe Golfer.
1 shared topicsstartups
65match
abiolaajibola.dev
Abiola Ajibola | Product Engineer for Non-Technical Founders and Startups
1 shared topicsstartups
65match
malyly.com
Maly Ly | Founder of Wondr & Growth Leader
1 shared topicsstartups
65match
demoengineer.com
Demo Engineer
1 shared topicsstartups
65match
simonwhite.io
Simon White | Startup founder & systems engineer. Y Combinator alumn.
1 shared topicsstartups
64match
biancabking.com
Bianca B. King | Founder, Business Mentor
1 shared topicsstartups
64match
devansood.com
Devan Sood - Marketer & Founder
1 shared topicsstartups
64match
aren.me
aren.me – Innovator and Founder
1 shared topicsstartups
64match
naressi.com
Alex Naressi · Founder, Aberlay
1 shared topicsstartups
64match
365founder.com
365 Founder
1 shared topicsstartups
64match
charliemuirhead.com
Charlie Muirhead | Entrepreneur, CogX Founder & AI Leader
1 shared topicsstartups
64match
desifounders.com
Desi Founders
1 shared topicsstartups

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.