Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to evanbacon.dev

Evan Bacon · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
evanbaule.com
Evan Baule
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
evangordeaux.com
Evan Gordon
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
evanliu.com
Evan Liu
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
evanpblack.com
Evan Black - Software Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
evankaplan.com
Evan Kaplan
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
evan-peacock.com
Evan Peacock
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
evanperlman.com
Evan Perlman
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
evanwitt.dev
Evan Witt </>
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
ethanbudreau.com
Ethan Budreau - Software Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
natewake.dev
Portfolio | Nate Wakefield
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
andooown.dev
andooown
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
nathankurien.com
Nathan Kurien
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
ethanbutt.com
Ethan Bütt
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
alexpagnotta.dev
Alex Pagnotta
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
andriyoga.com
Andri Yoga | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
chasehaddleton.com
Chase Haddleton
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
patrickbillodeau.com
Patrick Billodeau – Software Developer - Fargo
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
evansagge.com
Evan Sagge - Software Engineering Leader
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.