similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to evalvnow.com

Home - Evalv IQ · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

technologysolutions.co.uk 🇬🇧

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

tecsolutions.co.uk 🇬🇧

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Home - EspioEdge

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Home - ETS.NTECH

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

connectlaburity.com

Home - Laburity

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

escapeerasmus.com

Home - ESCAP(E+)

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

atec-security.co.uk 🇬🇧

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

mobyonepartners.com

Home - eBook Author

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

sqntech.co.uk 🇬🇧

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

discovercassevern.com

Home - CAS Severn

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

eugene-zonda.com

Home - EugeneZonda

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

eugenezonda.com

Home - EugeneZonda

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Home - ESBO GLOBAL

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.