similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to evakmore.com

Eva K. More – author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

lydiahopebooks.com

Lydia Hope – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

dlleeauthor.com

D.L. Lee – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

annanthonyauthor.com

Ann Anthony – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Susan B. Wile – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

djdavisauthor.com

DJ Davis – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

helencorcoran.com

Helen Corcoran – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Ly Faulk – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

candicelabria.com

Candice LaBria – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

D.M. DeLuca – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

D.L. Hess – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

sherronelise.com

Sherron Elise – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

heididaniele.com

HEIDI DANIELE – AUTHOR

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Susan W Kemp – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

anneboothauthor.com

Anne Booth – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Cal Devney – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

G.E. Forth – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

molleafoust.com

Mollea Foust – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

caitlinwhitaker.com

Caitlin Whitaker – author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.