Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to esteledits.com

Estel Edits · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
angel-editing.com
Home | Angel Editing
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
68match
penpaleditors.com
Pen Pal Editors
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
researchediting.com
Research Editing
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
bgauthors.com
Home | BG Editorial
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
bgeditorial.com
Home | BG Editorial
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
bgplatformstudio.com
Home | BG Editorial
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
eyebrighteditorial.com
Eyebright Editorial
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
kimmybeachediting.com
Kimmy Beach Editing
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
nakingeditorial.com
N.A. King Editorial
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
5eeditors.com
5E Independent Editors
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
63match
pattersonedits.com
PATTERSONEDITS LLC - Home
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
63match
demiedits.com
Demi Edits From Manuscript to Masterpiece.
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
63match
kimifarleyediting.com
Kimi Farley Editing - Home
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
63match
evolved-editing.com
Evolved Editing, LLC - Home
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
63match
beyondthepaleediting.com
Home - Beyond the Pale Editing
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
63match
paskadeditor.com
PaskaD—Developmental Editor For Indie Authors
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
63match
simondcoll.com
Simon D. Coll – Academic Editing
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
62match
andreavinleyconverse.com
Developmental Editor | To the Point Editorial Services
2 shared topicspublishing-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.