Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to esotericamag.com

Esoterica Magazine | Substack · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
gardenofanxiety.com
Kruger Writes | Substack
2 shared topicsfiction
74match
andersvane.com
An author's life | Vane | Substack
2 shared topicsfiction
73match
annkyner.com
Ann Kyner | Substack
2 shared topicsfiction
72match
shesaidwithlove.com
She Said With Love | Jenn | Substack
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
hernamewasvonvellain.com
Von Vellain | Substack
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
andromedandreams.com
Andromedan Dreams | Pawel | Substack
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
anoveldetour.com
A Novel Detour | Coleen | Substack
2 shared topicsfiction
71match
sushilawood.com
Awe & Angst by Sushila Wood | Substack
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
angelicathorne.com
Angelica Thorne | 1980s Fiction, Books & Belonging | Substack
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
escapistcafe.com
Escapist Cafe | Prakash Chougule | Substack
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
etseqmag.com
Et Sequitur Magazine
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
animalbloodmagazine.com
Animal Blood Magazine
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
magazine-1.com
Magazine1
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
sheamagazine.com
Shea Magazine | A Celebration of Mixed Messages
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
andromedamagazine.com
Andromeda Magazine – Andromeda Magazine
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
distillerymagazine.com
Distillery Magazine
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
esotericarcana.com
Esoteric Arcana
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
cake-mag.com
cake magazine - the indie, confused and sweet magazine | cake-mag.com
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.