similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to esef-format.de

Esef Format alternatives & similar sites

ESEF-Manager — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Business Accounting And Finance →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
esef-reporting.org ↗	100 match 1 shared topics	ESEF-Manager	de	business-accounting-and-finance WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
esef-tagging.com ↗	100 match 1 shared topics	ESEF-Manager	de	business-accounting-and-finance WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
esef-tagging.org ↗	100 match 1 shared topics	ESEF-Manager	de	business-accounting-and-finance WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
esefrts.org ↗	100 match 1 shared topics	ESEF-Manager	de	business-accounting-and-finance WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
eseftesten.org ↗	100 match 1 shared topics	ESEF-Manager	de	business-accounting-and-finance WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
angebotsmanager24.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Angebotsmanager 2026	Germany de	business-accounting-and-finance	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bill-safe.ch ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	BillSafe – Rechnungsmanager	Switzerland de	business-accounting-and-finance	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bonitaetsmanager.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Bonitätsmanager - Optimieren Sie die Bonität Ihres Unternehmens	Germany de	business-accounting-and-finance	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brightanalytics.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	BrightAnalytics: konsolidierte Managementberichterstattung	Germany de	business-accounting-and-finance WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
bright-analytics.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	BrightAnalytics: konsolidierte Managementberichterstattung	Germany de	business-accounting-and-finance WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
czsg.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Managerial Costing - Controlling entscheidungsgerecht	de	business-accounting-and-finance WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fakturex.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	ameax Faktura: Effizientes Rechnungsmanagement für Sie	de	business-accounting-and-finance WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agicap.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Treasury Management System (TMS) \| Agicap	de	business-accounting-and-finance WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 2
agentur-finance.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Agentur Finance \| Financial Fitness im Agenturmanagement	Germany de	business-accounting-and-finance	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
auftrags-webmanager.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Online Rechnungsprogramm Auftrags-WEBManager \| Rechnungen online schreiben \| Rechnungssoftware	Germany de	business-accounting-and-finance Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
rheinbudget.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Rheinbudget - Liquiditätsmanagement Software	de	business-accounting-and-finance	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bonicloud.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	BoniCloud - Auskunfts- und Forderungsmanagement mit Creditreform	Germany de	business-accounting-and-finance	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
concur.ch ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Spesenabrechnung + Reisekostenmanagement Schweiz	Switzerland de	business-accounting-and-finance Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.