similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to errmoe.com

ERRMoe – Author – My books · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

BillDeFoor – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

BillAde – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Amy Barry – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

Ana Devise – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

Naeem Murr – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

nansampsonauthor.com

Nan Sampson – Author – Mystery, Magic and Mayhem

2 shared topicsfiction

Eva K. More – author

2 shared topicsfiction

Kim Neville – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

paulwalkerauthor.com

Paul Walker – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

amymarieauthor.com

Amy Marie – Author – Children's & YA Fantasy

2 shared topicsfiction

kimdevinebooks.com

Kim Devine – Author Information and Books

2 shared topicsfiction

patmcqueenauthor.com

Pat McQueen – Author – WritingtheWrongs

2 shared topicsfiction

reneeswindlebooks.com

Renee Swindle – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

amyarmitagewrites.com

Amy Armitage – Author – Sincere . Sweet . Steamy

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Amy Ressa – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

ilpohalonen.com

Ilpo Halo – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

J.C. King – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

angelajdawson.com

Angela J Dawson – Writer – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.