Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to erichsen.dev

Development Journal · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
pidev.com
PI Development
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
albadev.com
Alba Development
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
sortug.com
~sortug development
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
rulesof.dev
Rules of Development
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
onehourofdevelopment.com
One Hour of Development
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
ruanoestate.com
Edward Ruano Development
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
giohunt.com
Gio Hunt's Development Projects
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
plaipen.com
Plaipen - Development Interface
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
alecfong.com
Journal
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
luzeon.com
Luzeon | Mobile Development
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
pithjournal.com
Pith Journal
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
aerokong.com
Aero Kong - Drone Development
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
katemiranda.com
Kate | Software Development Manager
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
pkozakdev.com
P. Kozak | Software Development
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
deckspire.com
Deckspire | A Product Development Firm
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
nurhakkaya.com
Nurhak Kaya's Software Development Blog
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
ah-journal.com
ah-journal
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
axis6.com
:: Axis Six LLC :: software development ::
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.