Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to ereira.dev

maccath (Katy Ereira) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
100match
katy-ereira.com
maccath (Katy Ereira) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
degelo.dev
jnzd (Jonas) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
ossama.dev
ousid (Oussama) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
epyzo.com
EPYZO · GitHub
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
deleonemail.com
CDeLeon94 · GitHub
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
sargeit.com
SargeIT · GitHub
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
iandy.dev
iAndy88 · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
gerardforcada.com
gerardforcada (Gerard Forcada) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
erthenvar.com
erthenvar · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
alawi.dev
ALAWI CO · GitHub
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
nthippe.com
xanthippe · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
saltforged.com
saltforged (Dan Viney) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
sandipsubedi.com
sandipsubedi (Sandip Subedi) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
kartiba.com
Kartiba · GitHub
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
runnerable.com
runnerable · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
epsilongruis.com
epsilongruis · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
ervacon.com
Ervacon · GitHub
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
nwilson5.com
nwilson5 (Nicholas Wilson) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.