Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to erbrown.com

E R Brown | Writer & Editor · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
78match
kolchak50.com
JAMES AQUILONE | WRITER & EDITOR
2 shared topicsfiction
75match
calsetar.com
Calvin Setar – Writer & Editor
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
74match
arilord.com
Ari Lord – Writer & Editor
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
bd-writer.com
Belinda Hermawan | Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
cameronccarter.com
Cameron C. Carter | Fiction Writer & Educator
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
geofbard.com
Geof Bard | Author & Editor
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
suzyeynon.com
Suzy Eynon | Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
anneelyons.com
Annee Lyons | Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
arlenemark.com
Arlene Mark | writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
reynamardergentin.com
Reyna Marder Gentin | Writer - Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
anushkajasraj.com
Anushka Jasraj - writer & researcher
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
annahuitran.com
Anna Hui Tran | Writer | Home
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
lynseymay.com
Lynsey May | Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
susan-brearley.com
Susan Brearley | Mystery Writer & Developmental Editor
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
aaronjacobswrites.com
Aaron Jacobs | writer
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
andreakbeck.com
AndreaKBeck | writer
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
estebancajigas.com
Esteban Cajigas – Fiction Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
gavinneale.com
Gavin Neale – Writer | The home of writer and blogger Gavin Neale
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.