Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to eraser.io

Eraser – AI co-pilot for technical design · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
52match
kili-technology.com
Kili Technology: The Most Robust Annotation Tool for Building Powerful AI
3 co-citations5 shared tech2 shared categoryartificial-intelligence
46match
kmflabs.com
kmflabs | Keep moving forward
2 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categoryartificial-intelligence
45match
metagravity.com
MetaGravity
2 co-citations5 shared tech2 shared categorytechnology-and-computing
44match
emailgrepr.com
Grepr.ai | Cut Observability Costs Without Migration
2 co-citations5 shared tech2 shared categoryartificial-intelligence
44match
mezmo.com
AI-Driven Telemetry Data Platform for Agentic Ops | Mezmo
2 co-citations5 shared tech2 shared categoryartificial-intelligence
44match
mezmo.ai
AI-Driven Telemetry Data Platform for Agentic Ops | Mezmo
2 co-citations5 shared tech2 shared categoryartificial-intelligence
43match
bferns.com
Ben Ferns - Portfolio Site
2 co-citations5 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-and-computing
43match
abdisportfolio.com
Abdi's Portfolio
1 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categoryartificial-intelligence
42match
cyprusdata.org
Cyprus Data
1 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categorytechnology-and-computing
42match
3fourlabs.com
3Four Labs | Product Design & Development for Real Teams
1 co-citations5 shared tech2 shared categoryartificial-intelligence
42match
alpafyonluoglu.com
Alp Afyonluoğlu
2 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categoryartificial-intelligence
42match
myfrugalbot.com
Frugal: Proactive Visibility and Control Over Cloud & AI costs
1 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categorycloud-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.