similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to equalityindicators.org

Equalityindicators alternatives & similar sites

Equity Indicators – Institute for State and Local Governance — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Civic Affairs →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
equityindicators.org ↗	85 match 1 shared topics	Equity Indicators – Institute for State and Local Governance	United States~ en	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4urban.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	4urban – Institute for Urban Development	en	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
equityinpolicy.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Equity in Policy Institute	en	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
culturepolicy.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Culture and Arts Policy Institute	en	civic-affairs WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eastgatecog.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Community Planning \| Local Governments \| Eastgate	United States~ en	civic-affairs	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
equityagenda.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Equity Agenda – Forging Local Paths to Gender Equity	en	civic-affairs WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
essimonaco.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	European Small States Institute – Realizing the Potential of the European Small State Contribution	en	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
earthnomad.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Urban Science Institute	en	civic-affairs	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cupe2998.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	CUPE Local 2998 – Information for members of CUPE Local 2998	en	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
esii.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Emergent Strategy Ideation Institute – Emergent Strategy Ideation Institute	en	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cwcdafrica.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	cwcd – Centre For Civic, Citizen’s Welfare And Community Development	en	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
barlestone.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Barlestone.net - Local news and community information for the village of Barlestone, Leicestershire	en	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kccitallahassee.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Home - Knight Creative Communities Institute	United States~ en	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
faharivoices.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Fahari Voices \| Tanzania's Civic Engagement & Governance Platform	TZ~ en	civic-affairs	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
equityinhistory.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Home - Southern Maryland Equity in History Coalition	en	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
equityclt.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Charlotte Mayor's Racial Equity Initiative	en	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
barringtonscoop.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	The Scoop Barrington \| Discover Local Insights	en	civic-affairs Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
maynebc.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Mayne Island Residents & Ratepayers Association – Information and Resources for Community Dialog	en	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.