similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to epigraphik.net

Epigraphik alternatives & similar sites

epigraphica europea – Literaturdatenbank — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Books And Literature →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
ava-international.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	AVA international GmbH – Literaturagentur	Germany de	books-and-literature Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
europa-literaturkreis.net ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Willkommen beim Europa-Literaturkreis Kapfenberg	de	books-and-literature	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
boox-verlag.ch ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Schweizer Literatur \| boox-verlag	Switzerland de	books-and-literature Wix Wix Stores	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
booxverlag.ch ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Schweizer Literatur \| boox-verlag	Switzerland de	books-and-literature Wix Wix Stores	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
ausmeinerfeder.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Aus meiner Feder – Steeler Literatur	Germany de	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hiddenbookparadise.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Hidden Book Paradise – Gedanken ▽ Worte ▽ Literatur	de	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
athene-media.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	AtheneMedia Verlag: Literatur, die bewegt!	Germany de	books-and-literature	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
besterpodcast.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	SiCKCAST – contemporary literature by pseudo literary people	Germany de	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eliasschneitter.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Elias Schneitter Literatur Verlag - Elias Schneitter Autor	de	books-and-literature Jimdo	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
corinacaduff.ch ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Corina Caduff · Literatur- und Kulturwissenschaftlerin	Switzerland de	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fabianelfeld.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Fabian Elfeld, Schriftsteller – was mit Literatur im weiteren Sinne	de	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brigittewerner.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Brigitte Werner - Literatur, Lesungen, Workshops	de	books-and-literature	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dasgrauesofa.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	das graue sofa \| vom Lesen zeitgenössischer Literatur	de	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ausgezeichnet-literaturpreise.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Ausgezeichnete Literaturpreise	Germany de	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
buchhexe.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Buchhexe - Rezensionen zu Büchern und Literatur aller Art	de	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
starlit-automobile.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	BuchStern Essen – Entdecke, teile und genieße Literatur in Essen	de	books-and-literature	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ewaldbroksch.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Ewald Broksch - Literatur, die unter die Haut geht	de	books-and-literature	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agenturkroll.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Agentur Kroll \| Literaturagentur / Filmrechtevermittlung	Germany de	books-and-literature WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.