similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to ense.ch

Ense alternatives & similar sites

ENSE – Enterprise Network und Security Engineering — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
mcdonalds-corporation.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	SecureNet – Enterprise Security	United States~ en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anomalousem.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	AnomalousEm \| Security Engineering	en	information-and-network-security Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cyrusx.io ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	CyrusX — Free Network Engineering & Cybersecurity Tools	en	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kdandy.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	kdandy - Security Engineer	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
d-cryptor.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Cybersecurity \| ST Engineering	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
enterpriselinuxsecurity.show ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Enterprise Linux Security	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cybershieldglobal.tech ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	CyberShield \| Enterprise Security Expert	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danielcho.app ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Daniel Cho \| Security Engineer	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
principle-networks.co.uk ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Principle Networks \| Enterprise Cybersecurity & Network Solutions	United Kingdom en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
principlenetworks.co.uk ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Principle Networks \| Enterprise Cybersecurity & Network Solutions	United Kingdom en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danieldusek.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Daniel Dušek, Security Engineer	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
omninetworx.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	OmniNetworx - Enterprise Security for Small Businesses	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
srujandasari.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	SRUJAN DASARI \| SECURITY ENGINEER	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
czakey.net ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	czakey :: Cyber Security & Network Architect. Sound engineer	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xsha.io ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	0xSHA · Security Research & Engineering	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
apiezy.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Apiezy - Enterprise Security Trust Layer	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
enterprisecybersecurity.info ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Enterprise Cybersecurity - Home	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bbravegatekeeper.cloud ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	B-Brave Gatekeeper — Enterprise IT Security & Network Management Platform	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.