similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to embed.ly

Embed alternatives & similar sites

Embedly makes your content more engaging and easier to share | Embedly — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
customerfeedbacknews.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Customer Feedback News » Store, share and tag your favourite customer feedback links	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
devcontent.tech ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	DevContent	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
customerexperiencenews.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Customer Experience News » Store, share and tag your favourite Customer experience links	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
technicallyproduct.co.uk ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Technically Product \| Digital marketing and web analytics	United Kingdom en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
fourthsource.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Digital Marketing and Tech News and Opinion - Fourth Source	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
datafeedplugins.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Datafeedplugins - eCommerce Data Feed Management	en	technology-and-computing WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
visualead.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Visual QR Code Generator - Visualead	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stanhive.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	StanHive — Your audience. Your platform. Your revenue.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0zzz.net ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Stape \| Server-Side Tracking Made Easy For Everyone	en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mediadatacapi.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Stape \| Server-Side Tracking Made Easy For Everyone	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stape-server.io ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Stape \| Server-Side Tracking Made Easy For Everyone	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stape.ai ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Stape \| Server-Side Tracking Made Easy For Everyone	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
stape.io ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Stape \| Server-Side Tracking Made Easy For Everyone	en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stape-server.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Stape \| Server-Side Tracking Made Easy For Everyone	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stapeio-alternatives.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Stape \| Server-Side Tracking Made Easy For Everyone	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stapeserver.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Stape \| Server-Side Tracking Made Easy For Everyone	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stapeteam.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Stape \| Server-Side Tracking Made Easy For Everyone	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stape-alternative.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Stape \| Server-Side Tracking Made Easy For Everyone	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.