similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to elliotsatherpd.com

Elliotsatherpd alternatives & similar sites

Elliot Sather Product Development – Product Design and Development Consulting — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
dancoder.dev ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	My journey through native development, web development and devops	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lifeintech.co.uk ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	LifeinTECH \| Technology and Development	United Kingdom en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csmithfiles.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Caleb Smith \| Product Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
zklabs.ch ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	ZK Labs \| Auditing and Development for Ethereum/Blockchain Projects	Switzerland en	technology-and-computing Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
olvera-dev.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Olvera Development – Development of all types.	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
omni-wave.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Embedded Systems Development	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
squareboat.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Squareboat: Design-first Software Development Company	en	technology-and-computing Square Online	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designedbyruss.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Russ Seidametov — Product Designer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stackpixels247.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Stack Pixels 247: Web Development and Design Tips & Tutorials	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hpd4.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	HPD4 – Development playground for HPD	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
destinydesigns.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Destiny Designs -- Electronics Design and Consulting	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
erikforsstrom.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Erik Forsström – Product Development & Innovation	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vireodev.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Vireo Development	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
david-sutter.ch ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	David Sutter \| Automation, Computer Vision, Reverse Engineering and Technical Product Development	Switzerland en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
starknetpractice.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Starknet Practice - Your Guide to Starknet Development	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cselectricalandelectronics.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	CSEE - Design. Develop. Dominate.	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1kbgz.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	1kbgz - Development Studio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stalkbased.dev ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Stalk-Based Development \| Stalk-Based Development	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.