Piperic Business Intelligence

similar sites

Sites similar to elifinelli.com

Home · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation

hexenpictures.com

2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorymovies

2 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorymovies

kennethgalm.com

2 co-citations2 shared tech0 shared categorymusic

2 co-citations2 shared tech0 shared categoryrock-music

2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorymovies

2 co-citations2 shared tech0 shared categorymusic

aortaofficial.com

2 co-citations2 shared tech0 shared categorymusic

bandwagonlive.com

2 co-citations2 shared tech0 shared categorymusic

2 co-citations2 shared tech0 shared categoryreligious-music-and-audio

bornandraisedmusic.com

2 co-citations2 shared tech0 shared categorycountry-music

2 co-citations2 shared tech0 shared categorymusic

advlandvideo.com

2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorymovies

青いコンパス

2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorymovies

cavicchioni.com

Michael Cavicchioni

2 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorymovies

cesarproducciones.com

César Producciones

2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorymovies

hexmovieofficial.com

1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorymovies

juliacraftmusic.com

2 co-citations2 shared tech0 shared categorydance-and-electronic-music

kylestauffermusic.com

2 co-citations2 shared tech0 shared categorymusic

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

co-citations how often the same third-party websites link out to both — sites referenced together tend to serve the same world.
shared tech how much of their technology stack (CMS, e‑commerce, analytics, frameworks…) overlaps.
shared category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
positioning how closely their titles and on‑page wording line up.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.