Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to eladnava.com

Elad Nava · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
63match
lasconic.com
Lasconic's notes
4 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryprogramming-languages
59match
anilwadghule.com
Anil Wadghule - Elixir, Phoenix Software Developer
4 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorysoftware-and-applications
56match
bibekgupta.com
Bibek's Blog
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-and-computing
56match
burakisikli.com
/root
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-and-computing
56match
elitecdx.com
Symbolics LISP Engineering
3 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-and-computing
56match
ankitkumarsinha.com
Ankit Kumar Sinha — QA Automation Engineer | Playwright · API · CI/CD
2 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-and-computing
55match
launchbadge.com
Build it fast, build it right | LaunchBadge
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-and-computing
55match
billyramogi.com
Billy Ramogi
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorysoftware-and-applications
55match
bluewantingred.com
Blue Wanting Red: an InfoSec blog - To be the best Blue possible, you must also want to be Red.
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryinformation-and-network-security
55match
caitlinmallen.com
Caitlin M. Allen | All opinions and statements do not represent my employer
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-and-computing
55match
chetanarya.com
Chetan Arya's technology blog
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-and-computing
55match
alrawasabed.com
AlRawasAbed
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.