Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to ekspla.com

EKSPLA | Award winning laser technologies · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
36match
maximgavrilenko.com
Dr. Maxim Gavrilenko – igneous petrologist
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorygeology
36match
ambasci.com
AMBA SCIENTIFIC - Sensing World Through Isotopes
2 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryscience
35match
3c-labs.com
3C-LABS – contingent – coherent – collaborative
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryscience
35match
americansasquatch22.com
Dr. Milo Meeker’s Field Notes – The Adventures of the World‘s Leading Sasquatch Researcher
2 shared tech1 shared categoryscience
35match
christianslab.com
Christians Research Lab – Christians Research Lab in semiconductors and halide perovskites at Hope College
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryscience
35match
magicmagma.com
Magic Magma – Inner structure of the Earth
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorygeology
35match
huiwenjigroup.com
JI GROUP – Solid State Materials Research Lab
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryscience
35match
farlowsci.com
Innovation in Glass, Excellence in Science – Where Art and Science Shape Glass
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryscience
35match
alphasix.ai
AlphaSix - Assimilating Earth to advance intelligence and benefit humanity
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryscience
35match
abpaleo.com
abpaleo – Alberto Boscaini, PhD
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorybiological-sciences
34match
microbio4future.com
HOME - Martyna's Research
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorybiological-sciences
34match
far-tech.com
FAR-TECH, Inc.
2 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryphysics

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.